An analysis of 12 angry men paper
There is one juror, juror number 8, who is not convinced that the boy is guilty.
12 angry men cast
They were working towards the task of changing one jurors mind. Twelve jurors, men of different classes with various backgrounds, file in to the jury room given the incredible responsibility of deciding whether there is reasonable doubt whether the accused boy committed the murder This method as described in the Working with Group Conflict article as, prodding the parties with questions to get them to explain themselves and in turn resolving the conflict between jurors. How will one person convince eleven other jurors of reasonable doubt and change their votes from guilty to not guilty? The jury has to decide if the young Latino killed his father by stabbing him to death. All but one were convinced the boy on trial was guilty of first degree murder based on eye witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. Within the characters there are overt moral and ethical issues raised. The judge was very specific when he said that the decision must be unanimous. When the twelve men headed inside the conference room to discuss the verdict, all of the men except one juror raised their hand for guilty The juror that was the Architect in the suit was probably the strongest leader in the group Justice is something that has been debated heavily for the entire existence of human life In this movie, the characters have to face a long and grueling procedure of figuring out how to charge the kid after a six day long trial and hours long deliberation between the jurors.
However, it was characters like Juror Eight, that checked his intuition that saved the accused boy from the death penalty An overarching and prominent theme of discussion in the movie is the impact that personality has on the way that individuals communicate with others.
Sometimes it was helpful, but most times it was unhelpful.
There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. We as an audience are also left with the narrative as was unfolded, and it is down to us whether we believe that the truth was uncovered or whether it was just a matter of objective persuasion and therefore whether the ends justify the means.
Which characters base their decisions on prejudice? However, one juror stands firm and says that they should at least give him an hour.
The jurors are then locked into a small room on a hot summer day. It is a masterpiece of stylized realism--the style coming in the way the photography and editing comment on the bare bones of the content.
To improve our thinking, we actually have to think for ourselves, to explore and make sense of thinking situations by using our thinking abilities.
based on 43 review